|
Recently, due to the Colorado shooting incident,
there has been much media atention directed towards this movie, and towards a
particular dream sequence.. I would like you to read this following article..it speaks the truth amidst a
sea of injustice regarding this movie.. Stephen Hunter, Washington Post Staff Writer,April 28, 1999 America has become a bilingual country and the two languages are not
English and Spanish. They are irony and literalism. That's one of the sad realities confirmed by the slaughter in Littleton,
Colo., where two boys enacted in the language of literalism some scenarios they
had seen delivered in the language of irony. The movie, however, with its plot,
characters, meanings, style, emotional center and aesthetic strategy, is clearly
another case. The movie, which most video outlets pulled from their shelves last
week, is most famous (and most relevant) for a scene in which Leonardo DiCaprio,
as Carroll, kicks his way into a parochial school class, yanks out a concealed
shotgun from beneath his trench coat and proceeds to blow away "enemy"
classmates and priests while his buddies cheer and shout and leap about with
joy. This sequence, which Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold seemed to replicate in
the corridors of Columbine High, has been replayed on the news many times since
then, and in shreds it's a terrifying spectacle, a kind of razzle-dazzle
endorsement of the joys of mass murder in a schoolroom. But of course it's "ironic," like most of pop culture. That is to say, it arrives encoded with signals that--as most people will
understand instinctively--remove it from the literal. It's offered as a fantasy,
its very outrageousness a part of the elaborate structure that maintains: Boys
and girls, do not try this at home. These are trained professionals. It's only a
movie. The scene is set up as a dream sequence, a metaphor for the heroin-induced
madness into which our diarist, an angry, talented and death-haunted young man,
is in the process of falling. Jim (DiCaprio) has just injected heroin; his face
goes slack, his head falls back. The camera settles on his beautiful blankness
and closed eyes: This is shorthand that expresses the literal idea that "we are
going inside a mind." We are about to see the images flickering behind those
beatifically languid eyelids. At this point, we enter a formal dream sequence, filled with signifiers
screeching: THIS IS NOT REALLY HAPPENING. The entire technique of the film
changes: The camera is low to the floor, looking up at DiCaprio, who advances
manfully in slow motion, each pounding step ritualized and gigantic. (The whole
sequence plays in slow motion, again meant to signify an anti-reality.) An
indoor wind ruffles his golden locks. He is dressed in a black leather
floor-length coat and hobnail black boots. He looks like Darth Vader wearing the
head of an angel. In short, everything has been stylized, fetishized,
theatricalized, in stark contradiction to what has passed before, when the
filmmaking grammar has been naturalistic to the point of rawness. The signifiers increase: He kicks his way through a wall, knocking down a
portrait of Christ, symbolizing the Church--and begins to shoot, to the glee of
his pals and the horror of his victims. Again, the shootings are slow-mo,
outrageous (blood spurts through the air), aestheticized so you know IT IS NOT
HAPPENING. His final moment brings him to a cowering priest. He leans over the
desk, extends the shotgun barrel to the priest's head and pulls the . . . Then, in a flash, that same priest wakes him roughly in the real classroom,
bringing him back to reality. The film has not endorsed schoolroom massacres. It has instead evoked a
fantasy of a schoolroom massacre to convey the desolation of this young man,
whose own best friend has just died, whose basketball coach has tried to molest
him, who's been beaten raw by the priests, who is fatherless and whose
dispirited mother has all but given up on him, and who has come to see the world
as a cynical sewer. The whole sequence makes a presumption that the audience is
capable of making this elemental distinction, between the real and
exaggerated.
![]()
TBO's performance throughout the film is absolutely captivating.....his
emotional path to desperation and destruction is so real...you can't help
feeling the pain right along with him. To quote the young actor, "It's certainly not a film that glorifies drugs.
It doesn't preach things like 'Just say no' either. What it does show is that
the first hit can do it....can be the start of some real trouble. This movie
took me places I'd never been before, acting wise. Withdrawal was the hardest
thing to play. It's like being an animal, in a primal state." An interview with Leonardo, 1995 To quote "Leonardo DiCaprio...Romantic Hero"...by Mark Bego "The Basketball Diaries brilliantly proved that Leonardo DiCaprio could
throw himself into a role, carry an entire film, and emerge a dedicated and
likable actor, in spite of the film's subject matter." Here's some examples of Jim Carroll's poetry, some of it you will hear
Leonardo as Jim quoting in this powerful movie.
The movie itself is a low budget eye opening experience. It is set against a
very dark and grimy backdrop, with filth and squallor galore as the scenery, and
the dark alleys of dirty New York City as the favourite haunts for Jim and his
buddies. Director Scott Kalvert remembers working with Leonardo, and recalls it
being a very 'real' experience for him as a young 20 year old. "They all
worked very hard, and got very grubby. They became real." The actor himself though, has stated many times that he has developed a love
for New York City since making this movie. He says, "Everyone was harping on
me about how much LA was blasted.....and I was like, 'No, man, I love LA.!' But
after I came here, I was like, 'Now I see what you're saying.' I love it! I want
to move here. You could sit alone at one corner all day and probably have a more
fulfilling day than travelling all over LA. and seeing all the sights!"
This kind of criticism took him aback....and he still has a hard time with
the press..refusing to 'play their game'. He says, "I'm a 23 year old guy who
goes out with my friends. My mistake is that I think I can be like a normal
human being and have fun and go to normal places. But I'm realizing that I have
to live a sheltered life, where I watch out for everything I do. I certainly
don't think I'm leading a destructive lifestyle. I just try to loosen up the
best way I know how. All these actors think that the blood in their viens is
fueled by acting. I'm happier hanging out with my friends, doing the things that
I love." ![]() Don't ever change, Leonardo, and don't ever stop bringing us these fascinating characters! |